Understanding Two-Phase Commit in Microservices

Understanding Two-Phase Commit in Microservices

Table of Contents

🔄 Protocol Overview — The Two-Phase Commit (2PC) protocol is a distributed algorithm used to ensure that a transaction is either committed or aborted across all participating nodes in a distributed system.

1️⃣ Prepare Phase — In this phase, the coordinator sends a prepare request to all participants. Each participant prepares to commit the transaction and logs the changes but does not commit yet. They respond with a vote to commit or abort.

2️⃣ Commit Phase — If all participants vote to commit, the coordinator sends a commit request to all. If any participant votes to abort, the coordinator sends an abort request. Participants then commit or abort based on the coordinator’s decision.

⚖️ Consistency — 2PC ensures strict consistency across services by coordinating a global commit, making it suitable for scenarios requiring atomic transactions.

⚠️ Challenges — The protocol can introduce performance bottlenecks and single points of failure, especially if the coordinator fails during the process.

Protocol Phases

🔍 Prepare Phase — The coordinator sends a prepare request to all participants. Participants prepare the transaction, log changes, and respond with a commit or abort vote.

🔗 Commit Phase — If all votes are to commit, the coordinator sends a commit request. If any vote is to abort, an abort request is sent. Participants act based on the coordinator’s final decision.

🕒 Timing — The protocol requires careful timing and coordination to ensure all participants are ready to commit simultaneously.

📜 Logging — Participants log their actions during the prepare phase to ensure they can commit or abort as instructed.

🔄 Rollback — If any participant votes to abort, the entire transaction is rolled back to maintain consistency.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantage - Consistency — 2PC provides strict consistency, ensuring all nodes agree on the transaction outcome.

Disadvantage - Performance — The protocol can cause performance bottlenecks due to the need for coordination and potential delays.

Disadvantage - Single Point of Failure — The coordinator is a single point of failure, which can disrupt the entire transaction process if it fails.

Advantage - Atomicity — Ensures that a transaction is fully completed or not at all, maintaining data integrity.

Disadvantage - Complexity — Implementing 2PC can be complex, requiring careful management of transaction states and logs.

Use Cases

🏦 Bank Transfers — Ensures atomic transfer of funds between accounts in different banking systems.

🗄️ Distributed Databases — Coordinates commits across multiple database nodes to ensure data consistency.

📦 Inventory Management — Synchronizes stock levels across different locations or systems to prevent overselling.

💳 Payment Processing — Ensures all parts of a payment transaction are completed or none at all.

📊 Financial Transactions — Used in scenarios where financial data integrity is critical and must be maintained across systems.

Read On LinkedIn or WhatsApp

Follow me on: LinkedIn | WhatsApp | Medium | Dev.to | Github

Related Posts

The Journey of Data in a Web Application

The Journey of Data in a Web Application

🌐 Internet — The internet is the network that allows clients and servers to exchange information. It acts as the medium through which requests and responses travel.

Read More
Understanding Database Sharding

Understanding Database Sharding

Understanding Database Sharding

🔍 Definition — Database sharding is a method of distributing a large database across multiple machines to improve performance and scalability.

Read More
Understanding Event-Driven Architecture

Understanding Event-Driven Architecture

🔄 Definition — Event-driven architecture (EDA) is a software design model that focuses on the publication, capture, processing, and storage of events, allowing systems to respond in real-time or near-real-time.

Read More